6 thoughts on “From the Daily Express to the Evening News

  1. Thanks for this – and its link and your introduction: Ralph Nevill does sound interesting!

    Things I had to look up, and did with some sort of success:

    “Meminisse juvat” seems to be indebted (especially as Machen uses it) to Virgil’s Aeneid, Book I, line 203 (where the future tense is used: “juvabit”);

    the Wikipedia article about Dickens’s novel, Bleak House, tells us “Sir Leicester Dedlock is a crusty baronet, much older than his wife. Dedlock is an unthinking conservative who regards the Jarndyce and Jarndyce lawsuit as a mark of distinction worthy of a man of his family lineage. On the other hand, he is shown as a loving and devoted husband towards Lady Dedlock, even after he learns about her secret.”

    Like

  2. Context is far from everything, but it is probably always of interest – such as concerning what Machen quotes from page 3 of Nevill’s book about “arrogance on the part of men or women of Semitic extraction”. The page starts with “Money” followed by “millionaires” and by the bottom of page 4 gets on to “More breezy and irresponsible are the wealthy Americans who make England their playground.” In between – for what it is worth – he writes “no sensible individual can approve of attempts to arouse racial hatred or view Anti-Semitism with anything but disgust”. On page 19 (still in chapter 1 on “Society”) “Jew millionaires and American snobs” appear together.

    The third result of my word-search for ‘Jew’ occurs (p. 158) in a discussion in chapter five (“Paris”) on the Dreyfus affair, in which one sentence begins “The whole ‘affaire’ arose through racial hatred” (p. 157). Of course, many a word search – which I have not (yet?) attempted – for ‘related terms’ is possible… and the results might be in keeping with Nevill’s attention in these to the opportunism of “racial hatred”.

    Like

    1. Very helpful! Thank you for reporting these important facts. Also, I must apologize… I had forgotten to activate the comment section for this Weekly article. I have now corrected that oversight. Thank you for persevering in posting your comments!

      Like

  3. By the way, assuming the title is Machen’s own, is it a playful reference to Edward Bellamy’s 1888 novel? A word-search for Bellamy in Nevill’s book finds nothing. Do ‘we’ know if Machen knew it, and what he thought of it, if he did?

    Like

    1. I think that we can safely assume that Machen probably read Bellamy. However, I have not noted any direct comment by AM on this writer or his novel.

      Like

      1. Thanks! For better or worse, I associate Looking Backward and Butler’s Erewhon (1872) in my mind, and know that both Tolkien and Lewis knew the latter, but have never yet got round to reading either, myself! I see Anna Simon has done a LibriVox audiobook of Looking Backward, and probably ought to give that a try (I am currently enjoying her reading of F. Anstey’s In Brief Authority (1915)!).

        Like

Leave a comment